For leadership teams
Give people the context they need to help, and capture their perspectives before they see everyone else’s conclusions. Reality Skill’s team decision-making software supports independent input, deliberate reveal, and evidence-linked discussion so you can explore what each person noticed before making an accountable commitment.
Establish a decision standard your leadership team can use.
Establish a decision standard while preserving independent contribution and clear authority.
See who is responsible, what is blocked, the current step and the recorded trajectory. Review concerns, request an update and respond with a clarification or linked course review.
Read the shared context and contribute independently before reveal. Compare the revealed views, raise a concern and report what changed during follow-through.
See requests across authorized clients, read the shared packet, offer an independent view and return to the client’s response or follow-up request.
The core Team Room has 2–7 participants. wider consultation separately gathers input from 8–100 invited members. The named owner keeps decision authority. Advisor access requires admission and a current client grant.
Independent input · interactive worked example
See how a team can preserve distinct information before discussion and then turn disagreement into useful work.
Illustrative workflow · software can reduce influence pressure, not guarantee candor or eliminate groupthink.
The decision owner shares the objective, known evidence, constraints, and the specific help needed. People are asked what they know, question, and would try.
The CTO records a dependency risk. The COO notices an operational constraint. The commercial lead proposes a smaller launch. None can anchor the others yet.
The team sees where observations overlap, which assumptions conflict, and which alternative appeared only once. Minority views remain attributable and preserved.
The owner records what changed, what remains uncertain, the chosen move, and a Reality Date. Participation informs the decision; accountability stays named.
Your objective: write one decision question and provide the same material context to every contributor. Ask for observations, concerns, alternatives, and what would change their view. Reveal only after the required independent input is in.
Open your decision workspace →Protected feedback
Alongside named Team Room contributions, invited participants can leave a separate anonymous-to-team note about an overlooked risk or alternative. The decision owner can address the concern before committing, without asking its author to disagree publicly with the leader or group.
Add evidence and a possible next test in a separate note. On supported browsers, where company AI policy allows, an optional on-device AI rewrite can help neutralize distinctive writing style. You review and edit the suggestion before sharing.
Notes remain sealed during independent collection. After a successful reveal, the invited decision team can read them; the decision lead can record whether to investigate, test, address or decline a concern, with a reason.
The note can influence the decision while its author stays unnamed to the decision team and company leaders. After the round is published, only the author can choose to reveal their name for that note; leaders cannot do it for them.
A company administrator who is also a current invited decision participant can hide a published note for abuse, exposed private information, or spam, with a recorded reason. Disagreement itself is not a moderation category. A visible placeholder, hidden-note count, and moderation history remain.
Current invited participants can request reconsideration without their name appearing on the appeal. The moderator can restore the note or uphold the decision with another explanation. Moderators can review preserved original text, but do not receive the anonymous author’s identity. Prior downloads and screenshots cannot be recalled.
The decision team and company leaders see the concern without the author’s name. Content and context can still suggest identity; infrastructure operators retain technical access. The author reviews any optional rewrite before sharing and controls whether to claim authorship later. See privacy and access details.
Protected Team Room feedback is for invited participants. A separate wider consultation can gather named or anonymous-to-audience input from 8–100 invited colleagues; it does not give them decision authority.
Before discussion
Name the decision owner and explain the contribution and reveal rules. Share relevant context, then let each participant record unique knowledge, options, assumptions, predictions, concerns, and what would change their mind before seeing anyone else’s view. Entries remain separate until the reveal conditions are met.
During deliberation
Compare contributions side by side. Surface disagreement explicitly, discuss the underlying evidence, and retain dissent as part of the decision record.
After commitment
The decision lead records the chosen path, owner, next action, forecast, and Reality Date. Later, the team returns to compare its expectations with the outcome.
The problem this process addresses
See how independent input before discussion can preserve unique knowledge, reduce early anchoring, and make consequential disagreement easier to examine.
Read the groupthink guideQuestions, answered
It creates space for team members to record independent views before discussion and keeps those views distinct through a deliberate reveal.
No. It does not manufacture agreement from averages. The team sees areas of alignment and disagreement, while the named decision owner retains authority.
Team Rooms are designed for leadership groups and other small decision teams working on consequential choices. Availability can be discussed for your use case.
Your first company decision
Bring one recurring problem. The first assisted checks are coordinated by hand; participation, scope and dates are agreed before work starts. You keep the decision.
Request an assisted checkSee current annual license prices · Explore the product demo
Keep the question connected
Related guides: Delegate a Business Investigation · When Owner and Manager Disagree · How to Reduce Groupthink in Team Decisions
See an investigation in practice: prepared owner and manager demo. Prepare your Focus Card · Start a personal situation free · Advisor role.